Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 448
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 29  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 82-88

Risk factors of road traffic accidents in Rural and Urban areas of indonesia based on the national survey of year 2018


1 Department of Public Health, Faculty of Sports Science, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia
2 Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine Public Health and Nursing, Gadjah Mada University, Sleman, Indonesia
3 Department of Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia
4 Department of Public Health, Post Graduate School, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Sleman, Indonesia

Date of Submission17-Dec-2021
Date of Decision16-Jan-2022
Date of Acceptance25-Jan-2022
Date of Web Publication23-Apr-2022

Correspondence Address:
Intan Zainafree
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Sports Science, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang
Indonesia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/npmj.npmj_777_21

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Context: Indonesia has a large population with a large number of motorised vehicles, so it cannot be separated from traffic accidents. Aims: This study aimed to determine and analyse the advanced level risk factors for road traffic accidents (RTA) in rural and urban areas based on data from the Basic Health Research 2018 (Riskesdas). Methods: This study used Riskesdas data sourced from the National Institute of Health Research and Development, Ministry of Health, Indonesia, which was collected from 34 provinces in Indonesia using a cross-sectional method. The statistical data consisted of 59,423 respondents aged over 15 years old, who had experienced a road traffic injury and lived in rural or urban areas. The data variables analysis was socio-demographic, lifestyle, smoking status, alcohol consumption, mental disorders, nutritional status and use of helmets on motorcycle riders and passengers. Statistical Analysis: Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyse the most dominant risk factors related to RTA in rural and urban areas. Results: The prevalence of RTA in urban areas was 34.1%, while in rural areas was 28.2%. The factors related to traffic accidents in respondents from urban areas (P < 0.005) were sex (1.342 [1.217–1.480]), age (1.111 [1.067–1.156]) and use of helmets on motorcycle riders and passengers (0.662 [0.566–0.771]). Meanwhile, risk factors for respondents from rural areas (P < 0.005) were mental disorders (0.842 [0.743–0.955]), age (1.095 [1.040–1.154]) and use of helmets on motorcycle riders and passengers (0.682 [0.585–0.796]). Conclusions: We found that the prevalence of RTA in urban areas was higher than in rural areas. The dominant risk factors related to RTA in Indonesia were age, sex, mental disorders and the use of helmets on motorcycle riders and passengers. This finding supports the importance of road safety education and the prevention of RTA needs to be done both in urban and rural areas.

Keywords: Indonesia, motor vehicles, road injury, road traffic accident, urban-rural


How to cite this article:
Zainafree I, Syukria N, Addina S, Saefurrohim MZ. Risk factors of road traffic accidents in Rural and Urban areas of indonesia based on the national survey of year 2018. Niger Postgrad Med J 2022;29:82-8

How to cite this URL:
Zainafree I, Syukria N, Addina S, Saefurrohim MZ. Risk factors of road traffic accidents in Rural and Urban areas of indonesia based on the national survey of year 2018. Niger Postgrad Med J [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Sep 26];29:82-8. Available from: https://www.npmj.org/text.asp?2022/29/2/82/343742




  Introduction Top


The Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) was an assessment study of diseases, injuries and risk factors that cause mortality and disability in people around the world. GBD 2019 found that road traffic injuries (RTIs) were the first cause of death due to injury compared to other causes.[1] The global status report on road safety also showed that road traffic accidents (RTA) cause more than 1.3 million deaths annually.[1],[2] Half of all road traffic deaths in the world occur in the Western Pacific region (RTA death rate per capita 26.6/100,000 population) and the South-East Asia region (RTA death rate per capita 20.7/100,000 population) most of which belong to low-middle income countries.[3],[4]

The death due to RTI was a leading cause of injury-related disability-adjusted life years (DALYs).[5] Globally, around 20–50 million people suffer from accidental injuries in all age groups.[2] RTIs became the first rank of DALYs among 10–24 years of age.[1] The highest RTI was experienced by countries in the South-East Asia region.[1],[6] Indonesia became the country with the highest number of RTIs in Southeast Asia since 2010.[3],[7] RTA was a top-rank leading cause of death in Indonesia for 10–24 years of age.[8] RTA was the eighth-leading cause of death in Indonesia and accounted for 2.46% of deaths RTA from the total population death.[3]

RTA occurred due to human factors, 34% due to operational deficiencies, and 12% due to vehicle breakdowns.[9] A cross-sectional study in India showed that RTA occurred more among males (77.5%) who came from rural areas (67%).[10] The same thing was found in Korea that males were 1.5 times more likely to be injured in accidents than females.[11] Various studies have reported that the influence of drugs and alcohol consumption significantly increases the likelihood of RTA at 16–20 years of age. A person under the influence of alcohol tends to drive at higher speeds.[12]

Another study stated that obesity was reported as RTA risk factors.[13] A study reported that a person obese have low agility and speed of activity,[14] and at high risk for obstructive sleep apnoea.[15] In addition, obese people were reported to rarely use seat belts, this may cause more serious injuries in RTA.[16] The other risk factors in the occurrence of traffic accidents were mental disorders of drivers (odds ratio [OR] = 2.4), especially female drivers, lack of knowledge of driving safety and unsafe behaviour from drivers such as not wearing a helmet, operating a mobile phone while driving, speeding and violating traffic.[9],[17]

A study in China distinguished risk factors for traffic accidents in urban and rural areas and reported that the prevalence of traffic accidents among urban residents was 13.2% higher than that of rural areas, which was positively related to minority status, income and mental disorder scores at the individual level.[18] In contrast to previous research reports that states rural areas were more at risk of RTA.[19],[20] Most studies identified and compared locations hazardous roads often originate in the US, Europe or Australia and were not always applicable in a Southeast Asian context Most studies originating from the US, Europe or Australia identify and compare the location of hazardous roads between rural and urban areas, but these results are not applicable in the context of countries in Southeast Asia.[18] This study contributed to mapping the factors of RTA in urban and rural areas of Indonesia based on Basic Health Research (Riskesdas) 2018. Therefore, this study contributes to mapping RTA factors in urban and rural areas in one of the Southeast Asian countries, namely Indonesia, based on the results of the 2018 Basic Health Research (Riskesdas).


  Methods Top


Data sources and subjects

This research used secondary data from the 2018 basic health research survey which was sourced from the National Institute of Health Research and Development (NIHRD), Indonesian Ministry of Health. The research was a national-scale survey with a cross-sectional and non-interventional design conducted every 5 years. Briefly, participant selection was made through a two-stage hierarchical clustering sample drawn from nationwide, including 34 provinces and 514 municipalities/districts in Indonesia. The data were collected by using interviews, measurements and examinations. The interviews used two instruments, namely: household instruments and individual instruments. The details of sampling techniques, survey design, survey instruments, measurement systems and quality control have been described in several publications.[21] We used information collected from 59,423 respondents over the age of 15 who had experienced on injury.

Variables

Dependent variable

Traffic accident data were taken from individual questionnaires with code E-06 that were differentiated by urban and rural areas. The classification of urban and rural areas based on Riskesdas refers to the Regulation of the Head of Central Statistics Agency Number 37-year 2010. It was about the status of an administrative area at the district level based on certain classification criteria in terms of population density; percentage of agricultural households and availability/access to public facilities owned by a village/district to determine the urban or rural status of a village/district.

Independent variables

In this study, the independent variables were selected based on previous research, there were 11 independent variables that we analyzed; sex, age, marital status, occupation, education level, smoking status, alcohol consumption, mental disorders (mental disorder status was determined by a WHO Self-Reporting Questionnaire-20,[21],[22] nutritional status and use of helmets on motorcycle riders and passengers.

Statistical analysis

The data were presented in frequency and percentage based on a history of RTA. Chi-square analysis was performed to determine the relationship between the independent variable and the dependent variable. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The independent variable which has a P value lower than 0.25 is included in the multivariable analysis. We analysed the final model using Binary Regression Logistic. All analyses were performed by SPSS 22.0 (IBM Corporation, NY, USA).

Ethical clearance

The Research Ethics Committee of NIHRD, Indonesian MoH reviewed and approved the survey protocol, design, data and questionnaire (Number: LB.02.01/2/KE.024/2018). There was no further ethical clearance required for the analysis of the secondary data. All participants were asked for consent and signed its form in the survey.


  Results Top


General characteristics of the study subjects

The general characteristics of the population studied are presented in [Table 1], the majority of respondents from urban areas were male (57.6%), aged 15–34 years (48.3%), married (64.4%), employed (74.0%), had a low level of education (53.8%), everyday smokers (29.3%), did not consume alcohol (92.4%), had mental disorders (58.2%), normal nutritional status (50.5%), had experienced an injury because of an accident (34.1%), wearing a helmet (85.1%). While most respondents from rural areas were male (59.0%), aged 15–34 years (45.4%), married (70.9%), employed (77.3%), have a low level of education (75.9%), everyday smokers (33.6%), did not consume alcohol (90.3%), has mental disorders (59.1%), has an underweight status (59.4%), has experienced an injury due to an accident (28.2%) and wear helmet (69.2%). Overall, respondents from urban and rural areas have the same individual characteristics tendencies.
Table 1: Characteristics of respondents based on region

Click here to view


Based on [Table 2], injured limbs, it was known that the tendency of the location of the injury between respondents from urban and rural areas was similar, they tend to never have a head injury (89.5% of urban respondents and 89.0% of rural respondents), never have a chest injury (97.0% of urban respondents and 96.0% of rural respondents), never had a back injury (92.4% of urban respondents and 90.2% of rural respondents), never had an abdominal injury (97.8% of urban respondents and 97.1% of rural respondents), never experienced injuries to the upper limbs (64.4% of urban respondents and 64.5% of rural respondents) and had experienced injuries to the lower limbs (66.0% of urban respondents and 64.2% of rural respondents). Based on the type of injury, it was known that most respondents from urban areas suffered from bruising (59.3%), superficial injuries (20.2%) and sprains (37.5%), while most respondents from rural areas experienced this type of injury, bruising (58.2%), superficial injuries (25.4%) and sprains (34.6%).
Table 2: Characteristic of traffic injuries

Click here to view


[Figure 1] shows that respondents were injured due to accidents. The majority of respondents experienced an injury while using a motorcycle either as a rider (76.81% of urban respondents and 74.12% of rural respondents) and as passengers (15.44% of urban respondents and 19.51% of rural respondents). This shows that both in urban and rural areas, motorcycles are a vehicle that is often used.
Figure 1: Distribution of injuries by road user type

Click here to view


Based on [Table 3], it showed that respondents who come from urban areas have significant relationship with the incidence of traffic accidents with marital status (P = 0.001), employment status (P = 0.001), age (P = 0.001), wear helmet (P = 0.001), alcohol consumption (P = 0.016), mental disorders (P = 0.042), education level (P = 0.002), sex (P = 0.001) and nutritional status (P = 0.042). While the respondents in rural areas, the variables that were significantly related to the incidence of traffic accidents were marital status (P = 0.001), employment status (P = 0.001), age (P = 0.001), use of helmets on motorcycle riders and passengers (P = 0.001), alcohol consumption (P = 0.001), (P = 0.002), mental disorders (P = 0.001), education level (P = 0.001) and sex (P = 0.001).
Table 3: Bivariate analysis of determinants of road traffic accident

Click here to view


Based on [Table 4], it was known that the multivariate analysis using logistic regression tests was carried out with 7 models with the last model showing that the factors associated with traffic accidents in respondents from urban areas (P < 0.005) were sex (1.342 [1.217–1.480]), age (1.111 [1.067–1.156]), and use of helmets on motorcycle riders and passengers (0.662 [0.566–0.771]). Meanwhile, respondents from rural areas (P < 0.005) were mental disorders (0.842 [0.743–0.955]), age (1.095 [1.040–1.154]) and use of helmets on motorcycle riders and passengers (0.682 [0.585–0.796]).
Table 4: Multivariate analysis of determinants of road traffic accident

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


RTA is a major burden of disease in the world, including in Indonesia. The reason was the high number of registered vehicles and the relatively good road access that passes through urban and rural. Preliminary analysis found that the high prevalence of traffic accidents in Indonesia occurred more in urban areas (34.1%) than in rural areas (28.2%). This was consistent with previous studies in several developing countries, such as studies in Malaysia,[23] and Kosovo.[24] The level of population density in urban areas with various activities on the edge and along city roads, traffic jam, undirected traffic flow systems, as well as high-speed driving behaviour, reckless overtaking and not complying with traffic regulations can cause increase the frequency of traffic accidents in urban areas.[25]

Accidents on urban highways only caused minor injuries to the victims and were classified as non-fatal accidents. Accidents on urban highways caused more victims of minor injuries that require a quick recovery time than victims who lose their lives. The results of data analysis showed that most city residents who had been involved in a traffic accident only suffered minor injuries, such as abrasions/bruising (59.3%), cuts/tearing/stab wounds (20.2%) and sprains (37.5%). When compared with the data on the severity of traffic accident injuries in rural areas, the victims of accidents with minor injuries were more in urban areas. The same phenomenon also occurs in Thailand,[16] and England[26] Factors such as driver's characteristics and actions, road characteristics, environmental characteristics and speed of first aid play an important role in determining the severity of RTA, in both urban and rural areas. In addition, highways in urban areas tend to be divided into several segments and covered with concrete; thus, it is allowing accident victims to suffer only minor injuries.[27],[28]

Motorcycle drivers were considered vulnerable road users because motorcycle accidents were a major cause of traffic injuries.[27] It was because motorcycles are the main choice of transportation for the Indonesian people because of their relatively low cost and practical use according to road conditions. Similar results were also found in Columbia, where 77.4% of traffic accident victims were motorcycle drivers so that motorcycles were identified as the vehicle with the highest probability of an urban accident.[27] Another finding in Singapore, most of the victims of traffic accidents also involve motorcycle passengers (60.1%) because 51.1% of them were passengers who were children and their behaviour is not controlled.[29] Thus, variations in traffic accident victims were caused by road conditions and the level of knowledge of driving safety in these countries.

Generally, RTA in rural areas includes demographic factors, such as sex, age, occupation, education level, smoking status, alcohol consumption, mental disorders and nutritional status; and driving behaviour (i. e. use of helmets on motorcycle riders and passengers).

The factors influencing road traffic accident in urban areas

The role of differences in age and sex in traffic accidents attracts attention. Related to sex, we found that traffic accidents were shown to increase by 1.342 times when the drivers were male. Sex is a strong predictor of risky driving behaviour, with men being more prone to risky driving behaviour than women.[16] In general, female drivers are considered safer than males. That was due to men who tend to be more impulsive, drive at high speeds, and are given relatively greater freedom to explore their environment, as well as the fact that more men have driver's licenses than women.[30]

The difference of age group that causes traffic accidents in urban areas was mostly dominated by the 18–30 year age group which is associated with a lack of experience and aggressive driving behaviour.[30],[31] That was in contrast to our findings which show that the age group over 75 years old is more prone (OR = 1.111) to have traffic accidents. The increasing age of drivers in line with driving experience is refuted by the findings of this study and is consistent with research in Australia, where experienced drivers tend to be the main contributors to accidents.[32] Another study found that the highest injury index due to traffic accidents occurred in men in the elderly group (>65 years). This is associated with disproportionately elderly drivers riding motorcycles, plus road conditions, decreased physical endurance, decreased concentration power while driving and decreased ability of elderly drivers to avoid fatal accident situations.[33]

Another variable that contributes to traffic accidents in urban areas in Indonesia is the use of helmets on motorcycle riders and passengers. Our findings the same with studies in Malaysia,[23] Thailand,[34] and Iran,[35] where helmet-wearing drivers experienced were less crashes. Research in Benin found that riders who did not wear helmets had a higher risk of head injury (OR = 3.8) than those who wore helmets.[36]

The factors influencing road traffic accident in rural areas

We found three of the 10 factors identified as the main factors influencing accidents in rural areas. These three factors are age, mental disorders and use of helmets on motorcycle riders and passengers. The risk factors for traffic accidents in rural areas of Indonesia related to the dominant age are from the age group >75 years. This finding is like the findings of other studies which found that elderly people are more prone to being involved in accidents.[16] Decreased physical and mental abilities with increasing age led to be the risky behaviour in elderly drivers and pedestrians.[33] The other causes include decreased visual and cognitive function, mental health and decreased mobility.[20] The magnitude of these risk factors is accompanied by a greater risk of fatal injury due to the intensification of fragility by age-related degeneration of physical and mental conditions.[37],[38]

We found that helmetless drivers in urban areas of Indonesia are also at risk in rural areas because they can increase the severity of injury to accident victims. [Table 4] shows that motorcycle drivers without helmets are 0.682 times more likely to be involved in traffic accidents in rural areas. Motorcyclists without helmets in rural areas have been found to increase the likelihood of fatal injuries due to bumpy and sloping road contours,[16] In addition, the reluctance of rural communities to wear helmets is caused by the notion that helmets are not necessary for short distances, discomfort, hearing difficulties, dishevel hair, interest in wearing traditional head coverings, the possibility of helmets being stolen, expensive helmet prices,[39] and lack of police control.[40] In the elderly group, wearing a helmet is considered an obstacle to greeting neighbour or colleagues.[40]

Recently, mental health also has been identified as a risk factor for accidents, especially in the elderly. We found that the driver's responsibility when driving in the countryside was influenced by emotional status. In short, the emotional dysregulation is a potential source of internal disturbances that can influence risky driving behaviour. In general, current psychological conditions, such as stress, depression, anxiety and dementia can have an impact on driving behaviour.[25] In addition, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder is also considered as a predictor of risk behaviour and accidents among motorcycle drivers in rural areas.[41] Analysis of mental and emotional disorders of motorcycle drivers in rural areas that are at risk of causing traffic accidents is influenced by the proportion of travel time on hiking trails, variations in instantaneous speed and poor road conditions.[41]


  Conclusions Top


We conclude that the factors associated with traffic accidents in respondents from urban areas were sex, age and helmet use. Besides, the respondents from rural areas are mental disorders, age and use of helmets. The limitation of this study was that information is limited on Riskesdas data regarding the demographics of the name of the area that only obtains information on urban or rural groups. Hence that it cannot be known for sure how the contours of the road and the level of population density in each group are. In addition, unknown whether respondents experienced mental disorders before or after RTA. We believe that the research findings be able to describe the risk factors for RTA between urban and rural areas in Indonesia because the respondents are people in every region in Indonesia. In the future, we recommend to study further the impact of traffic accidents in urban and rural areas on mental disorders due to accidents experienced.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 2020;396:1204-22.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
World Health Organization (WHO). Road traffic injuries [Internet]. World Heal. Organ.2021 [cited 2021 Nov 6];1. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/road-traffic-injuries.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Satria R, Tsoi KH, Castro M, Loo BP. A combined approach to address road traffic crashes beyond cities: Hot zone identification and countermeasures in Indonesia. Sustain 2020;12:1-18.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
World Health Organization (WHO). Global Status Report on Road. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2018.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Das P, Horton R. Disease control priorities, 3rd edition-from theory to practice. Lancet 2018;391:e9-10.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Kitamura Y, Hayashi MY. Traffic problems in Southeast Asia featuring the case of Cambodia's traffic accidents involving motorcycles. IATSS Res 2020;42:163-70.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Irzanto B. ASEAN transport strategic plan 2016-2025 and progress of road safety initiatives in ASEAN. Thailand: World Health Organization; 2019.   Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Widyastuti H, Thompson RG, Tay R, Huda M, Widiywati F, Prabawati AR. Evaluation of Indonesia road safety campaigns (RUNK). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2016 Jul 14; 227:530-5.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Alavi SS, Mohammadi MR, Souri H, Mohammadi Kalhori S, Jannatifard F, Sepahbodi G. Personality, driving behavior and mental disorders factors as predictors of road traffic accidents based on logistic regression. Iran J Med Sci 2017;42:24-31.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Kumar S, Srivastava DK, Kharya P, Sachan N, Kiran K. Analysis of risk factors contributing to road traffic accidents in a tertiary care hospital. A hospital based cross-sectional study. Chinese journal of traumatology. 2020 Jun 1; 23(03):159-62.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Hong SO, Kim B, Jo J, Kwon Y, Lee YK, Kim Y. Main results of the Korea National Hospital Discharge In-depth Injury Survey, 2004-2016. Epidemiol Health 2020;42:e2020044.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Health and Medicine Division, Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice, Committee on Accelerating Progress to Reduce Alcohol-Impaired Driving Fatalities, Getting to Zero Alcohol-Impaired Driving Fatalities: A Comprehensive Approach to a Persistent Problem. National Academies Press (US). Negussie, Y., Geller, A., & Teutsch, S. M. (Eds.): 2018.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Homaie Rad E, Khodadady-Hasankiadeh N, Kouchakinejad-Eramsadati L, Javadi F, Haghdoost Z, Hosseinpour M, et al. The relationship between weight indices and injuries and mortalities caused by the motor vehicle accidents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Inj Violence Res 2020;12:85-101.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Thakur JS. Association of obesity with agility and speed of university level kabaddi players. Intern J Phys Educ Sport Heal 2016;3:254-6.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Demirdöğen Çetinoğlu E, Görek Dilektaşlı A, Demir NA, Özkaya G, Acet NA, Durmuş E, et al. The relationship between driving simulation performance and obstructive sleep apnoea risk, daytime sleepiness, obesity and road traffic accident history of commercial drivers in Turkey. Sleep Breath 2015;19:865-72.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Se C, Champahom T, Jomnonkwao S, Chaimuang P, Ratanavaraha V. Empirical comparison of the effects of urban and rural crashes on motorcyclist injury severities: A correlated random parameters ordered probit approach with heterogeneity in means. Accid Anal Prev 2021;161:106352.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Mohammadi M, Alavi S, Jannatifard F, Mohammadi Kalhory S, Babareisi M, Khodakarami R. Bipolar disorders in truck drivers with driving licence gategory D & C. In Tehran: 5th congress of Iranian Psychological association (Contemporary Psychology, Biannual Journal of the Iranian Psychological Association) 2015.pp. 1411-4.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Rockett IRH, Jiang S, Yang Q, Yang T, Yang XY, Peng S, et al. Prevalence and regional correlates of road traffic injury among Chinese urban residents: A 21-city population-based study. Traffic Inj Prev 2017;18:623-30.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
McAndrews C, Beyer K, Guse CE, Layde P. Are rural places less safe for motorists? Definitions of urban and rural to understand road safety disparities. Inj Prev 2017;23:412-5.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Fraade-Blanar LA, Hansen RN, Chan KC, Sears JM, Thompson HJ, Crane PK, et al. Diagnosed dementia and the risk of motor vehicle crash among older drivers. Accid Anal Prev 2018;113:47-53.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Azam M, Sulistiana R, Fibriana AI, Savitri S, Aljunid SM. Prevalence of mental health disorders among elderly diabetics and associated risk factors in Indonesia. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18:10301.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Reuter A, Vollmer S, Aiyub A, Susanti SS, Marthoenis M. Mental distress and its association with sociodemographic and economic characteristics: Community-based household survey in Aceh, Indonesia. BJPsych Open 2020;6:e134.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Khalida MS, Khamisa NK, Mansora MR, Isac MH, Jawic ZM. Road user's perceptions towards motorcycle safety with regards to conspicuity in Malaysia road traffic. J Kejuruter 2020;3:75-82.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Ramadani N, Zhjeqi V, Berisha M, Hoxha R, Begolli I, Salihu D, et al. Public health profile of road traffic accidents in kosovo 2010-2015. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2017;5:1036-41.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Wang Z, Yue Y, Li Q, Nie K, Tu W, Liang S. Analyzing risk factors for fatality in urban traffic crashes: A case study of Wuhan, China. Sustainability. 2017 Jun; 9(6):897.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Cabrera-Arnau C, Prieto Curiel R, Bishop SR. Uncovering the behaviour of road accidents in urban areas. R Soc Open Sci 2020;7:191739.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Barzegar A, Ghadipasha M, Forouzesh M, Valiyari S, Khademi A. Epidemiologic study of traffic crash mortality among motorcycle users in Iran (2011-2017). Chin J Traumatol 2020;23:219-23.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Waseem M, Ahmed A, Saeed TU. Factors affecting motorcyclists' injury severities: An empirical assessment using random parameters logit model with heterogeneity in means and variances. Accid Anal Prev 2019;123:12-9.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Chong SL, Tyebally A, Chew SY, Lim YC, Feng XY, Chin ST, et al. Road traffic injuries among children and adolescents in Singapore – Who is at greatest risk? Accid Anal Prev 2017;100:59-64.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Rusli R, Oviedo-Trespalacios O, Abd Salam SA. Risky riding behaviours among motorcyclists in Malaysia: A roadside survey. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 2020;74:446-57.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Alkheder S. Learning from the past: Traffic safety in the eyes of affected local community in Abu Dhabi City, United Arab Emirates. Transp Lett 2017;9:20-38.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Allen T, Newstead S, Lenné MG, McClure R, Hillard P, Symmons M, et al. Contributing factors to motorcycle injury crashes in Victoria, Australia. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 2017;45:157-68.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Azami-Aghdash S, Aghaei MH, Sadeghi-Bazarghani H. Epidemiology of road traffic injuries among elderly people; a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bull Emerg Trauma 2018;6:279-91.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Kumphong J, Satiennam T, Satiennam W. The determinants of motorcyclists helmet use: Urban arterial road in Khon Kaen City, Thailand. J Safety Res 2018;67:93-7.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Khosravi Shadmani F, Mansori K, Karami M, Zayeri F, Shadman RK, Hanis SM, et al. Avoidable burden of risk factors for serious road traffic crashes in Iran: A modeling study. J Prev Med Public Health 2017;50:83-90.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Hounkpe Dos Santos B, Glele Ahanhanzo Y, Kpozehouen A, Daddah D, Lagarde E, Coppieters Y. Effect of wearing a helmet on the occurrence of head injuries in motorcycle riders in Benin: A case-control study. Inj Epidemiol 2021;8:17.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Casado-Sanz N, Guirao B, Gálvez-Pérez D. Population ageing and rural road accidents: Analysis of accident severity in traffic crashes with older pedestrians on Spanish crosstown roads. Res Transp Bus Manag 2019;30:100377.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Laosee O, Rattanapan C, Somrongthong R. Physical and cognitive functions affecting road traffic injuries among senior drivers. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2018;78:160-4.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Zainafree I, Hadisaputro S, Suwandono A, Widjanarko B. Adolescent riding behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic in Urban Area, Indonesia: A cross-sectional study. Ethiop J Heal Sci 2021;31:1133-42.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Ghasemzadeh S, Babazadeh T, Allahverdipour H, Sadeghi-Bazargani H, Kouzekanani K. Cognitive-behavioral determinants of using helmet by motorcyclists in a rural community. J Transp Heal 2017;6:548-54.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Mani A, Heydari ST, Sarikhani Y, Vossoughi M, Bagheri Lankarani K. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder as a determinant of motorcycle accidents in Fars province of Iran. J Inj Violence Res 2019;11:22.W  Back to cited text no. 41
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1861    
    Printed56    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded211    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]